The Mexico I Know (Part 2)

Feb. 26, 2025

Let’s return the focus on Mexico (Part 1 was posted yesterday here)

When I was a correspondent here 40 years ago, immigration was already a hot button. Yet it was a time when guest worker programs allowed people to travel legally for seasonal work and then return home. Many came to the same employer year after year to help pick crops in the agricultural fields of California, Arizona, Texas and Florida. Ask middle-age Mexican men in a rural area today if they know the United States, and invariably the answer is yes, with a quick description in usually broken English, of the cities and states where they worked. But they came and went every year. When the Reagan Administration began to clamp down on this kind of immigration and people had to run the risk of getting caught and deported and their names put on a watch list, they simply stayed and built parallel lives in the United States. I know that’s an oversimplification. But the evidence of a yearning for their homeland still exists in small towns all across Mexico. People will point to a well-built, sometimes new home, and they will say, “Oh yeah, that’s the Perez family’s—Miguel lives in California and sends money home.” In fact, if you study Mexico’s balance of payments, the flow of U.S. dollars from hard-working Mexicans sending money back to their families is one of the major sources of U.S. dollar currency reserves for the Mexican government (Unfortunately, another big chunk of those remittances is drug money being laundered). But the evidence shows an ongoing connection to their homeland, even if they have lived in America for decades.

Why not create a policy that allows Mexican citizens to move more freely back and forth? Mexicans love their country and will find ways to enjoy both their homeland and submit to the back-breaking jobs in the United States that help them build wealth back home. Before you dismiss this idea, there are restaurants in every major city in America that will have to shut down or curtail their offerings, if Mexicans are deported. Agricultural operations from California through Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and Florida that rely on immigrant labor to pick their crops will be harmed. (Recent news reports say that many crops are already not being picked because immigrants are afraid to show up for work out of fear ICE agents may be waiting to arrest them.) Or ask any industrial meat producer how they will cut your steaks if their workers don’t show. The solution is pretty simple, and with Mexico’s economic prowess increasing every day more feasible; give people the mechanism to travel back and forth. Simple.

The cross-border connection also highlights a cultural bond between the two nations. Some of these observations are obviously facile. But sometimes the obvious is the most revealing. I see more baseball-style hats of NFL and MLB teams here than I did in Westchester County, New York. Drive a car past any commercial strip here and you’ll see Walmart, Costco. McDonald’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Krispy Kreme, Home Depot, HEB…the list goes on and on. Amazon Mexico, just in the last five years, has gone from being a bit of a curiosity to my being able to order almost any item for delivery within a day or two, down to things like Diamond Crystal Kosher salt. Sky TV Mexico includes at least 8 NFL games every weekend day, plus Thursday, Friday and Monday night games. During the season, there are at least two MLB games broadcast daily and the same for NBA and NHL seasons. Or look at the other side of the border; Cinco de Mayo, guacamole, Corona beer, a boom in Tequila sales and Mexican restaurants on every fast food strip in America. My point? The two nations are intertwined culturally in more ways than Americans grasp. There’s also the obvious links in the western third of the United States where Spanish place names are commonplace. Why? They were part of Mexico until 1848.

There are also commercial links. Ford, which has assembly plants here, imports up to 40 percent of the parts used in final assembly of the cars from the United States, as does every other auto manufacturer.(https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11387.) The U.S. farm belt supplies Mexico with up to 40 percent of its domestic corn (https://www.ncga.com/stay-informed/media/the-corn-economy/article/2023/07/mexico-an-important-trade-destination-for-u-s-corn). The U.S. imports 637 million barrels of Mexican heavy crude oil and exports to Mexico 1.8 billion barrels of refined petroleum products, representing over 70 percent of Mexico’s consumption of gasoline, diesel, natural gas and jet fuel. In 2023 Mexico became the largest trading partner of the United States, nearly approaching $800 billion annually. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenroberts/2024/02/07/2023-results-are-in-us-has-new-top-port-trade-partner-export-import/) The United States is the leading importer of Mexican goods, by a factor of 40x compared to #2 Canada. Get the picture? There are companies on both sides of the border that rely on each other to produce their goods.

There’s a more interesting point that is hard to explain, but my perception is based on 40 years of observation. Mexico’s one percent is rich, by standards that compare to America’s new billionaire class. They have properties around the world. Many own private jets. They drive luxury imported automobiles that have triple digit duties added to their price, pushing many luxury cars into six-figure plus territory. They send their children to be educated abroad, not only in America but in Europe, too. They employ dozens of people in just their personal life at home. But they also invest in their own country. They build manufacturing plants. They start new businesses. They construct real estate with an eye toward economic expansion. Of course, they have stern competition from the government, but the new Sheinbaum administration has been reaching out for joint ventures in things like green energy and transportation. All with an eye on economic growth. Mexicans still believe in Mexico.

What happens if the United States disrupts that balance? The Mexican economy will suffer, at the very least for a while during a period of transition where it seeks other markets for its products. The United States will suffer labor shortages in the service and agricultural industries where food will rot on the ground for lack of people to harvest and restaurants in big cities like New York will struggle to find dishwashers and back of the house employees. Factories will suffer layoffs because they won’t be able to acquire the necessary imported parts or labor to manufacture or those parts will cost more money because of tariffs. With tariffs imposed, American consumers will pay more for their consumer products regardless of their origin but from Mexico also. And finally, if misguided U.S. policies destabilize the Mexican economy, the specter of unrest could increase exponentially. Isn’t it obvious that a healthy Mexican economy benefits the United States? Vice-versa is equally important.

There’s an additional irrationality being bandied about by MAGA conservatives: invade Mexico to crush the cartels. It requires an extraordinarily myopic view of Latin American and Mexican history to view that as anything but moronic and counterproductive. Latin Americans have lived for nearly 200 years with the looming presence north of their border that has threatened their national sovereignty. Remember the Monroe Doctrine? To actually authorize and execute any kind of “invasion” of Mexico would have exactly the opposite of any desired effect, would lead to the deaths of American military men on Mexican soil and turn the border into something like Lebanon and Israel, not two neighbors who have co-existed peacefully at least since 1848 since the last U.S. invasion of Mexico. No one should ever underestimate Mexico’s will to defend itself and resist any and all threats.

My point is pretty simple. Mexico and the United States share one of the longest borders in the world. For centuries, the comment also was that it was one of the biggest contrasts between any two borders in the world; books were written like Alan Riding’s, Distant Neighbors, highlighting those differences. And yet today, the cultures are more than ever intertwined. Our similarities have diminished those differences. We are not one nation. And we are not the same culture. But we share a common goal, and a common destiny too, and a cultural amalgam that will only be stronger if we find ways to move closer together, not farther apart. That starts with compromise and cooperation, not insults and invasions.

That’s the Mexico I know. Americans would benefit from learning that it’s not just beach resorts and pyramids. Mexico is a thriving, complex culture with a Jewish woman president searching for a pathway to modernity for all its people. We should help them get there.

Leave a comment

The Mexico I Know (Part 1)

Feb. 25, 2025

The Mexico I Know (In two Parts)

Part 1

Mexican immigrants and Mexico have become stalking horses for Republican politicians and America First conservatives for years now. They have found a scapegoat for their version of America’s problems that are not the fault of Mexico or Mexicans or Mexican Americans. And now, President Trump has accused the Mexican government of having an alliance with the drug cartels. If you believe in those erroneous accusations about immigration, the murderers and rapists flooding the United States or Mexico stealing jobs from hard-working Americans or that all our drug problems are the result of Mexican government policies, you’ll probably stop reading right now.

But let me tell you about the Mexico I know.

I have lived in Mexico for a total of nearly 20 years of my life, in two distinct eras. The first was from 1978 to 1985; I first arrived in Mexico City as a correspondent for the Associated Press and then I opened a news bureau there for the San Jose Mercury News, part of the now defunct Knight-Ridder newspaper chain. During that stay, my wife and I, college sweethearts, married in Tepoztlan, Morelos and after eight years, we nearly opted to remain in Mexico City. For many reasons, we didn’t stay. The second sojourn began remotely in 2011 when my wife and I purchased an 18th-century colonial house in need of renovation and then transitioned to full-time residency in October 2014 after the renovation was complete. I retired from Cigar Aficionado magazine that month and embarked on a new adventure. We felt we had come home.

My wife and I had decided to leave our comfortable American life to spend more time together and for each of us to pursue dreams and life goals that had languished in that routinized suburban life tethered to demanding 9 to 5 jobs in New York City. For me, it was to write novels, a life-long goal that I was determined not to let slide until it was too late.

In both eras in Mexico, I have enjoyed a privileged vantage point. In the 80s, my role was first as a wire service reporter and then as a newspaper bureau chief charged with explaining Mexico to the world and the United States. In this second time around, which started 10 years ago, we have integrated into a deep and complex culture with mostly Mexican friends. I believe that has happened because of our previous experience here and our fluency in Spanish and the resultant deep affinity for Mexico and its culture and in part due to our socio-economic advantages. Our old perspective from 40 years ago and of the new Mexico we are living in today have melded into a deep understanding of this country.

Let’s address the elephants in the room.

Yes, there is horrific drug cartel violence in this country. The cartels have morphed over the last 50 years into a separate power inside the country and almost certainly have corrupted government officials and law enforcement both in the past and today, not just in Mexico but in the United States too. But there is not a serious drug abuse problem here. Oh, there’s consumption but let’s be clear: the cartel’s principal drug markets are north of the border or across the oceans. Cartel violence receives headlines and causes worry but it is usually limited to areas of the country that they control and usually the violence is among rival cartels or people perceived as undermining or confronting their power. Tragic? Yes. Dangerous? Absolutely. (Is it really credible to believe that a government would support a criminal enterprise that has resulted in over 100,000 disappearances?) One other key issue; the current president of Mexico cited the fact that 70 percent of the arms carried by the cartels come from America. So, is the problem solvable? Not under any current policies on either side of the border.

Secondly, corruption is still endemic here. I live in a state where it is, relatively speaking, not as extreme as some other parts of the country, such as Mexico City. For instance, I have not been stopped once in 10 years by the local municipal or state police looking for a quick bribe to overlook some imagined infraction. Not once. My Mexican business friends speak of kickbacks and payoffs as part of the price of doing business in this country, especially when the government is involved, regardless of the party in power. (Honestly, I’ve concluded that corruption is just more above board here instead of under the table as it is in the United States where everyone turns a blind eye to corruption.) Two wrongs don’t make a right but let’s be clear, corruption is not unique to Mexico.

And thirdly, there are still large, impoverished rural areas of the country. The most indigenous populations there have benefited very little from the country’s progress since the 1970s from a third-world country into something closer to a player in the first world. But Mexico today ranks as the 11th largest economy on the planet and the largest trading partner of the United States. It’s economic and social progress, while not fast enough for all, has been steady, especially since the advent of NAFTA in 1994. But the underclass remains poor and often without opportunities to advance. It is probably safe to say that the more progressive administration of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and the current one of President Claudia Shinbaum have been a necessary accommodation to those poverty-stricken regions. The jury is still out on whether or not their policies have substantially impacted the poverty rate inside the country and whether they will avoid future unrest. The flip side of the issue is whether or not those policies and programs antagonize the middle and upper classes to the point where they abandon their own country. The jury is still out on both sides of the debate.

The truth is Mexico today has enjoyed some of the most advanced socio-economic progress in the Western World in the last 50 years. When we lived here in the late 70s, electrification of the rural areas was a project in process…today, there is not only electricity even in the smallest villages but there is cellphone coverage nationwide, better on average than what we experienced in New York. The birthrate was nearly 5 children per child-bearing age woman; today it is 1.98 per woman. (Source: U.N. World Population Trends). According to the World Bank, the number of persons living below the poverty line has dropped from over 10% of the population in 2000 to 1.2% in 2024.

Mexico is a different place today than when we lived here in the 1980s. The socioeconomic transformation is visible and in some categories quantifiable. Mexico’s middle class has become a vibrant, powerful segment of the population, up from about 10 percent of the country in the early 1980s to at least 40 percent of the population today. Homeownership is up. Car ownership is booming. In big metro areas like Mexico City, Guadalajara, Puebla, Monterrey, San Luis Potosi, Oaxaca and Queretaro, the cultural and culinary opportunities match many cities in the United States and Europe. The middle class aspires to advance and improve their lives, and the federal infrastructure — education, health care, government subsidies and even price supports for the basic commodities — is in place to help them make it happen without excessive personal burdens. That’s good for any country. However, in the real world, the kind of progress Mexico has experienced is a generational process, not an overnight phenomenon. No one would argue enough has been done. But without revolution, the economic growth and social accommodations have moved Mexico towards a more modern, equitable society. Slowly, but steadily. That augers well for the future and suggests it is in the U.S. interest to keep economic and social development moving forward. An ill-conceived, fear-mongering U.S policy could screw that up and hurt the U.S. too.

We also should understand the problem of illegal immigration. It is not just poor Mexicans trying to cross the border today. In fact, since the 2008 economic crisis in the United States, the net cross-border flow has been Mexicans repatriating to their own country. Yet people are coming from all over the world. Venezuela’s collapse from a once-wealthy country into a dysfunctional state leads the wave. Central Americans, other South Americans, Africans, Asians, especially Chinese, are all fleeing the growing oppression in their homelands; they are leaving behind dehumanizing poverty and oppression with no prospect of a humane life.

What does that suggest?

The American Dream is alive and well outside the country. People still think we are the planet’s best hope! Imagine yourself making that choice of packing up a nap sack with the belongings you think are necessary for the trip (let’s be clear, this is not a choice between one checked bag or two…it is a living example of the idea “The Things They Carried.). Then, there is a payment to some criminal organization involved in human trafficking; I can’t tell you what the price is today from Africa but from personal experience of people we happen to know, the price can be over $3000 here in Mexico with no guarantee of safe passage. Do you know what the minimum wage is in Mexico? Currently, it’s about $14 a day…so, a ticket north can take over 200 days of work, if all you do is save your money for the journey. Then, you face a long trek over dangerous desert or jammed-packed trailer tractors in blazing heat or bone-numbing cold. Even then, the rate of deportations, or ‘interventions” as the Border Patrol describes, was higher under President Obama and President Biden than Donald Trump;— we are talking millions every year turned back to Mexico or deported to their home nations. So even after saving for years, paying a criminal organization as your guide, traipsing or riding across an unforgiving landscape, you can still get caught and expelled to start from scratch all over again. If you can’t see the desperation behind the decision to head to America, you aren’t thinking clearly.

Part 2 comes tomorrow

One response to “The Mexico I Know (Part 1)”

  1. tim0668fff15930 Avatar
    tim0668fff15930

    Well done GM! Looking forward to part two. Tim

    Like

Leave a comment

Project 468

Jan. 20, 2025 (Reposted Jan. 22, 2025)

Today seems like good day to float some new ideas. The Democratic Party is mired in debates about what’s gone wrong in their message to the American people. Time to turn the page. New ideas. New people. No concessions to the party veterans. This is where the future begins. Everyone must start from the same place, a Ground Zero that leads to the future.

In recent election cycles, Democrats have focused resources on winnable seats in the House and Senate, and on winnable states in presidential contests. The party needs a new approach. The party must build a super PAC with enough money so it can contest every Congressional district and the 33 states where Senate seats are on the ballot in 2026, all 468 contests. Don’t focus just on winnable seats, but on EVERY seat even if there’s no prospect of winning. Find candidates who are courageous and willing to take on the impossible fights. The strategy is simple. Be sure EVERY American hears a Democratic Party message EVERY day of the campaign cycle on their home turf.

The campaign must start now. At the outset, the task is to find candidates in every House district. In some cases, the incumbents will be the easy choice. But no one should get a free pass. The primary process is about honing the message and the public presence of each candidate. In clearly red districts, the hardest work must happen. Candidates with broad appeal need to identified, trained and prepared for a bone-bruising task that often will end in defeat at the polls. But the presence of a candidate who can articulate a consistent Democratic message will go a long way to laying the foundation for 2028 and a presidential election victory.

There also is the need for a new Democratic Manifesto. Not a Project 2025 style right-wing treatise, but a clear, concise statement of what liberal democracy in America means today. Tell the American people what has been accomplished since the economic crash of 2008. There is a great story to tell. One that will stand up to the cascade of lies and disinformation about Democrats being Marxists and Communists, or that we are un-American (as Rudy Giuliani once accused me of being) because we vote Democrat. Absurdities will eventually begin to crumble under the consistent recitation of the truths and facts about the party’s successes, like the Inflation Reduction Act and infrastructure bill or the caps on prescription medicines or the Affordable Care Act. We know, because we welcome diverse points of view, that such an undertaking won’t be easy. But in the formative debates, consensus is possible. Agreement is not only possible but essential for the future.

No reason to be shy about the bottom line either. The plan is about money. The Republicans have had nearly 40 years to build a behind-the-scenes dark money colossus through men like Leonard Leo and more recently, Elon Musk. They have spent billions of dollars since the Reagan era creating partisan state legislatures through gerrymandering, nominating judges who adhere to an ultra-conservative doctrine and finally putting forth candidates whose primary qualification is fealty to the grand scheme of turning America into a one-party state. What was once Conservatism has morphed into a MAGA-led American First movement with designs on absolute power, free of any guardrails. That’s not hyperbole: Read Project 2025 and you see in black and white what the ultimate goal is. Building a financial war chest to counter the movement is legal; it’s the law of the land. Democrats should start using it to further their messages and their goals.

What will it take? Let’s use Elon Musk as a example. He donated at least $130 million dollars to the MAGA campaign and some estimates of his spending top $200 million. But there’s also the $44 billion dollars he paid for Twitter, which he then turned into a slanted propaganda, disinformation machine. Forget the Twitter purchase. If there are 20 super wealthy Americans, each willing to put $100 million into a super PAC set up to implement the 468 strategy, that’s all that’s needed to start. Many people are not interested in donating to previous campaigns that lost but will be on board for building a new nationwide coalition of committed democrats and patriots who want to return America to its founding ideals. We should look at the project as starting from ground zero and then support candidates who can transmit the message.

I am a single voice in the political wilderness and a political neophyte. But if you agree, spread the word. Get the idea out there. Start building the foundation to restore political balance in America. We are living the results of an ultra-conservative campaign that has worked silently for 40 years to seize the reins of power. If you don’t agree with any, or even just some of their policies, now is the time to step up and begin a people’s movement to re-establish sanity in government and restore the founding principles of the Republic and our democracy.

January 10th, 2025

This is a speech I gave to my 50th Class Reunion at Harvard College in May, 2024.

*******

From Newsman to Novelist

I’m a Watergate journalist. I came to my senior year pretty much adrift, no idea of what I wanted to do with my life. I’m class of ’74 but graduated in 1975 after a year off backpacking through Latin America. In the summer of 1974, I was inspired by the Washington Post investigation that led to Nixon’s resignation. It gave me the first hint of a career I might love where I could satisfy my thirst for adventure and also make a difference. I joined the Crimson my senior year and right after college I scored a full-time job at the Associated Press in New York. My Phd in news writing and reporting was under the gaze of grizzled chain-smoking wire service men…they were not impressed with my Harvard credentials. In July 1978 to my surprise, I was sent to Mexico City as a foreign correspondent. Six weeks after arrival there, I was in Managua, Nicaragua at the outset of the Sandinista revolution with gunfire outside my hotel. It was terrifying. But I was bursting with idealism and the belief that I could change the world.

Where did that idealism go? First it slammed into the ugliness of those violent conflicts in Nicaragua and then El Salvador. It was a rude awakening for a naive Harvard graduate. What had been idealism slipped into cynicism. It was made worse by a moderate case of PTSD, caused by seeing colleagues killed and the horrific violence of Salvadoran death squads. The world became a dark place.

I also confronted the limits of short 600 word news stories, especially when any hint of editorializing would be edited out. Rightfully so, but it highlighted how hard it was to actually change people’s minds. It was a lesson that would later fuel my desires to write fiction.

After Central America, my wife Donna, also class of ’74, and I moved to Paris for her job. I was a freelancer at the time, and I began work on a novel based on El Salvador. I still have my rejection letters…somewhere. I was really discouraged and still depressed. Between unpublished fiction and meager freelance fees, I needed to earn a living. We moved back to New York where I looked for work anywhere in journalism. I became a magazine editor and spent the next 25 years of my career, first at Newsweek, then with Wine Spectator and Cigar Aficionado. Instead of covering wars, I educated myself about wine, food AND cigars, and enlightened people about those pleasures, or vices, if you prefer.

During those years in New York, I also worked with a psychiatrist who helped relieve most of my PTSD. We talked a lot about my frustrated desire to write MY FICTION. One day, now about 20 years ago, he bluntly challenged me, “Do you have anything to say or not?”

I didn’t have an answer.

In the publishing world, there’s a saying: “Everyone has a book inside them … and that’s where it should stay.” With that skepticism toward first time fiction authors and my previous disappointments weighing on me, I asked myself: Did I have something to say? My enthusiasm for my editor’s job had worn thin; the great editor Harold Evans once said you shouldn’t spend more than five years in an editor’s chair or you get stale. I spent 20.

But the urge to write fiction simply wouldn’t go away. In the beginning, I carved out time every day on my train commute between our home and New York City, free of work and interruption for 45 minutes. The plot of my first novel, 10/10, took shape there, a dramatic tale that drew on my struggles with PTSD and my brush with 9/11. The plot explored how trauma changes people’s lives, a story I hoped would touch people, without attention-grabbing headlines.

But I couldn’t finish the book.

In 2014, Donna and I embarked on our next big adventure. We moved to Mexico, in part to get us out of a rut, in part to free me from my 9 to 5. I finished 10/10 after we got there. Why did it take so long to finish my first novel? As long as I still had that demanding editor’s job, fiction writing never topped my priorities. I also kept running up against my previous disappointments and insecurity about my writing. Through multiple drafts and several extensive rewrites, the story kept morphing until it was finally finished in 2018 and published in 2019.

I’m just getting started.

My next novel 20/20 tackles insurrection and the political and social turbulence caused by January 6th, 2021. 20/20 is clear eyed view of segregation and racism. I witnessed those first hand when my high school in north Florida was abruptly desegregated by the Supreme Court my senior year. Today’s extremist ideologies still promote those injustices. Yes, there is a 30/30 outline, an exploration of male friendship and journalism. I admit there’s no 40/40 story yet, but my Harvard experience is a leading contender. 50/50 is a Cain and Abel tale set in Central America, told through the lives of twin brothers on opposite sides of a civil war.

My fiction work illustrates the point of today’s seminar. I do still have something to say. After too many years, and too many hours, fighting pointless Facebook battles over Covid, the former president, and other contentious topics, 20/20 has given me an outlet to counter that frustration.

My voice, these books, are my way to be heard. I also hope that the books, the stories, will outlive me and be read, if only by family members in future generations. They seem more permanent than ephemeral news stories with my byline that would be read without context.

Legacy.

A permanent record.

That’s why I’m writing novels and why I’m not done yet.

January 6th, 2025

Deja vu, Again

Jan. 6th 2024— the date of my last blog. It seems fitting to post my first blog of 2025 on Jan. 6th, an unforgettable anniversary in American history. Today’s blog contains much the same message posted over a year ago. I committed then to writing more, and more often, about the things I cared about. At the time, I intended to write about whatever interested me, not just politics. My files include unpublished blogs about sneakers (yeah, go figure that one out) and Thomas Paine. But most blogs focused on my feelings about the upcoming presidential election. In those files is also the finished first draft of my second novel, 20/20. But the blogs and the book’s very political themes ran into my anxiety about exposing myself to the virulent, divisive political and social climate in the United States. My writing sat abandoned for most of the year. I don’t want the same outcome in 2025.

My resolutions and goals have foundered in the past, undermined by my lack of confidence, or the vicissitudes of life, or just plain procrastination often fueled by the two other excuses. 2024 was no different. By the post-Nov. 5 shock, my silence slid into isolation, walled off from the public, depressed by the election’s outcome, and puzzled by why people voted the way they did. But in my deep personal angst, I was mostly disappointed in myself that I had remained silent throughout the year; yes, there is hubris in that assessment. After all, who am I and why would my voice matter? Even though my fiction writing is one of the most important things in my life today, I let 20/20 languish too.

My underlying anxiety hasn’t disappeared, but the lingering internal turmoil has slowly morphed into a realization that artists and journalists need to find their voice in times of stress and discord. Now is the time. My internal struggles won’t magically disappear nor will the anxiety over inserting myself into the public debate. I can’t be sure on this morning in early 2025 that I will be able to surmount the obstacles that thwart me.

I’m not going to make any promises either. But I know where to start. Later this week, I will reprint my speech to my Class of ’74 reunion at Harvard College last May. I was one of about 10 people speaking to the theme, “I Still Have Something to Say.” The title of my speech was “From Newsman to Novelist.” After that, I hope to keep a bi-monthly schedule. And, at some point this year, I will publish 20/20.

Now is the time for all good people to speak up. We may each be a voice in the wilderness but a thousand voices might be heard amidst the din of falsehoods and disinformation. I hope my message won’t be shouting and arguing, nor the responses either. But it’s time to restore essential components of a functioning democracy — debate and compromise. I also plan to speak to one of the topics I know well: Mexico, especially its culture.

January 6th, 2024

Deja Vu

I have been absorbed in my annual end-of-the-year introspection and anticipation of a new year ahead. The past 12 months mostly occurred during my 70th year on the planet. There were good things: finishing my second novel, 20/20, taking an 18-day road trip with Donna down the Pacific Coast visiting friends, a wonderful Thanksgiving with my daughter’s in-laws and then my brother-in-law’s family. The tough side of the ledger has one big entry: knee replacement surgery on Sept. 13th. While my recovery has been successful, the entire effort dominated much of the second half of the year.

I’m determined to make the next year better by remembering and reasserting some basic goals and values. New Year’s resolutions never fully encompass what I’m talking about. My 2024 goals are not new, but more an updating of old desires and goals and energizing them with a new determination to dedicate myself to those goals and to keep them front of mind throughout the year. Write more, including a third novel. Improve my guitar playing. Be a better partner. Spend time with friends I care about. Waste less time.

For better or worse, these resolutions are recurring themes in my life. Thus, the title of the blog. I’ve posted a link below to a blog I wrote in July 2022, gordonmottauthor.com. I’ve also added below a quote from our family therapist, whose words unleashed my blocked desire to write fiction and start a blog. There are always excuses for why I have not been able to stick to those desires and regularly put my thoughts down on “paper.” Procrastination. Rebellion at the thought I HAVE to write to keep interest in my blog alive. Life’s curveballs and demands; a new knee, a daughter’s wedding, the small crises of daily life, keeping us fed and the house running. Fatigue over on-line battles with anti-vaxxers, Covid deniers and MAGA Trumpers. Golf. Visitors, etc, etc, etc.

I take solace in knowing that Covid did wreck havoc in my life in 2020 and 2021. Restoring some sense of purpose and normality took time. Yes, that is partly rationalization. However, our virtual lockdown in our own home from March 2020 until March 2021, when we flew to New York for our first vaccination, presented real challenges. In that year, despite our best efforts, Donna and I battled Covid infections — mine much milder than hers. We did spend more time together, without travel or socializing or anything else. But despite the inward focus, which in many ways was healthy and rejuvenating, in the end, I simply lost momentum. Not a depression per se but a loss of hope and optimism, up to that point two dependable constants in my life. The isolation often seemed like it would never end. But also, in that long, nearly two year period, two dear friends died, each loss a searing reminder of my age.

But here we are, nearly three years after that fateful realization we were living through a global pandemic. I have regained some motivation. I’m healthy again. My network of friends, here in Mexico and around the world, is thriving. Donna and I are enjoying the life we have built here.

And, in the midst of all the angst, 20/20, my second novel is written. The story follows the travails of Duncan Mount, a disgraced journalist who gets thrown into a conspiracy that threatens the future of American democracy. What better day than January 6th to announce that book will be coming soon — a propitious day also to relaunch my blog and begin reasserting my voice and my thoughts about life and the world we live in. In the weeks ahead you’ll read about sneakers, Antarctica, and my questions about the events barreling towards us in 2024.

I hope you enjoy. Best of luck with your own resolutions.

Please comment on:

You can also find all my old blogs there.

Links:

I’m Back
https://gordonmottauthor.com/2022/07/02/july-1-2022/

Quote from A Debut, May 10th, 2019
Our wonderful family therapist, Dr. Steve Fochios Sr. had asked me the most crucial question. He had heard my ramblings for years about my desire to write fiction, and my rationalizations about why it wasn’t happening. He asked me: “Do you have anything to say?” I knew I did, and in my mind, there is a dividing line before and after his question. It broke the logjam, and I began to look for the answer.

Memory

October 25, 2022

Memory is fickle. We remember some moments, and others we can’t recall. Why is that?

If we traverse a life of 70 years, that’s 3,640 weeks, 25,550 days, 613,200 hours, 36,780,000 minutes filled with life’s events and memories. I turn 70 today, Oct. 25th — which explains my interest in that timeframe. According to the website Clinical Neurologist Specialists, citing a Scientific American study from 2010, the human brain’s memory capacity is 2.5 petabytes, the equivalent of 2,560 terabytes, or 2.6 million gigabytes. So, how many petabytes, terabytes or gigabytes of information do we process in the course of 70 years? One study says we process up to 74 gigabytes a day, or nearly 2 million gigabytes in 25,550 days. To gauge what 2 million gigabytes means, consider that this MacBook Pro I’m writing on has 1TB of built-in storage, or a mere 1,024 gigabytes. A drop in the bucket. Therefore, apparently the brain is big enough to hold everything we have ever seen, touched, felt, said, and experienced. Then why can’t we remember every passing second in that life?

Okay, okay, you say, I get it. The brain is an amazing apparatus, a wondrous machine stuck on top of our skeletons that does much more than most of us even begin to tap into. Bad on me that I can’t access everything at the drop of a hat.

My point is not to suggest that we should remember everything, because we don’t and we can’t. Nor is it necessary. I don’t need to remember what I had for breakfast on June 13th, 1970 when I was not yet 18 years old. I don’t care, nor would the knowledge add anything to my current experience. That’s reality.

But why are some memories so much more potent than others?

I’m going to tell you some of mine. I hope you will tell me some of yours, too. Here’s the rule: Try to come up with memories that don’t have a photographic backup in your life. Those hard copy artifacts distort the memory of the events they capture — events like a victorious moment in your high school athletic career, your college graduation (god, I look so stoned in those pictures), your wedding, the birth of your first child, the purchase of your first house, your child’s wedding. Those are likely candidates to have been photographed. By the photos’ very existence, your brain’s memory is altered. I’m asking you to search for moments in your memory that exist outside your photographic archives. Do you want to label them peak experiences? Maybe they are. Or maybe they just touched you in some indeterminate way that permits you to summon them without any outside cues.

— A doctor’s office in São Paulo, Brazil where the corner of my eyelid was being stitched up after I, a three year old, tripped and smashed into the pointed corner of a coffee table with the orbital bone of my eye socket.

— Making out with my 19-year-old maid in Campinas, Brazil in a TV room as an almost pubescent 13-year-old boy while my parents stayed at the hospital after my father’s surgery.

— Seeing my someday-to-be wife talking to Jim Downey in the stairwell of my freshman dorm at Harvard.

— Standing in a railroad station in Bolivia as a 20-something, at 1am, high in the altiplano, and being able to read by starlight in an otherwise dark little town.

— Seeing a veil of white light on the JFK ramp leading to the airplane that was taking me to Mexico City in 1978 as a newly-assigned foreign correspondent.

— In 1981, in the dark, standing under a hideous green and orange tarpaulin lashed to the trees on the terrace of the weekend house where I was to be married the next morning, with three of my closest male friends getting ready to help haul it down.

— In a Paris bistro in 1985, watching a waiter clip a thick piece of glass siding on our banquette, and seeing it break in half next to my dinner guest facing me, slam into her head and knock her out.

— Sitting all night in a blond wood paneled birthing room at Lenox Hill hospital in 1989 while Donna labored away without success, and then in the morning hours, hearing the doctor say, she’s in distress, let’s get this baby out.

— My boss walking into my office one morning and saying, how’d you like to work on a cigar magazine.

— In my brother’s intensive care room in Washington D.C. in 1997, with the monitors blinking, the kidney machine pumping, and my sister-in-law and mother and sister standing beside him, looking into his eyes as I was leaving and saying, ‘I’ll see you on the other side.” He died the next morning.

— The moment when Donna had returned from a solo hiking trip in the Canadian Rockies and began to excitedly describe her experience, and my reflexive vision was, me, hurtling off an exposed cliffside trail into the abyss below.

— Standing at the back door of our house in Briarcliff Manor, NY, sticking the key into the door to lock it and breaking down in tears, while Donna and Liz waited in two cars in the driveway as we were leaving to drive to Wooster, Ohio for the start of Liz’s college life.

— As the light was fading in the vacant courtyard of our newly purchased, dilapidated colonial-era house in Queretaro, Mexico, seeing the sunset colors change on the old, white adobe walls and feeling the karma, that “this is the place.”

There are dozens and dozens more “moments” like those, memories that flood my head from time to time when I am feeling nostalgic, like before a 70th birthday.

With the advent of iPhone photo montages, moments without photographic evidence have become rarer. Nonetheless, digging around in your memory is a worthwhile exercise. There is a vast trove of events inside your head, and I believe, or at least suspect, that there is some merit in identifying the ones that have stood the test of time. On momentous birthdays, like a 70th, (well, it feels momentous and a bit overwhelming), it is reassuring to take a look back at where you’ve been, the things you’ve done, and how far you’ve come.

Within those unadulterated memories, there is a life. A life to remember. A life to cherish. A life to celebrate.

Behind the Veil

Oct. 15, 2022

Lake O’Hara. My fantasies of the backcountry paradise in Yoho National Park, just over the Continental Divide from Lake Louise, had kept me sane during a non-life-threatening summer illness. My desire to be there for our Sept. 2 reservation at Lake O’Hara Lodge inspired me to regain at least a bit of physical conditioning after three surgical procedures and four weeks without any exercise. I refused to let thoughts take over that I might be too weak, or not recovered enough, to hike. The fear was real.

On Sept 2, I stood in the parking lot at the bottom of the Lake O’Hara access road rising up into the mountains in front of me. Was I ready? I was there. Our luggage — my daughter Liz and her husband James and my wife Donna were on the trip too — was lined up waiting for the Lodge bus to come rolling down the road. Like magic, it appeared right on time around 9:30. 

Why do we go? Again and again and again. It was Donna’s 12th visit. My 11th, and Liz is already on her sixth trip there. James, my new son-in-law, has been there three times.

One reason is the stunning beauty. The ring of mountain peaks around Lake O’Hara, stretching down toward the Bow Valley, has been compared to the Swiss Alps. With good reason.

Parks Canada protocols also play a role. Every person who passes the hut at the bottom of the road for anything more than a day hike must have a reservation at the Lodge or at the Campground or at a small encampment known as the Elizabeth Parker Hut operated by the Alpine Club of Canada. On any given day, there are 100 people or less who have secured a space in one of those three places, and a seat space on the Lodge or Parks Canada buses both ways. You can walk in, and many do. But it’s an eight mile hike up the road (most people say it takes three hours) to try to take in as many sights as possible and then, you have to walk back down; no unauthorized camping allowed and no free ride on the buses. 

What do the access rules create? On any given day, in the more remote areas, you may see half a dozen people. On the longest round trip hike to Cathedral Prospect from the Lodge, I saw one other couple during the nearly seven-hour round trip. The semi-wilderness rules, and is not open to suggestions that the modern world should be allowed in.

The Lodge plays its own role in keeping O’Hara a paradise. Don’t get me wrong; it is not roughing it in backcountry to stay there.There are hot showers, or in my case, the tub baths. Electricity. A gourmet chef. A wine cellar well-stocked with Canadian wines. But that’s where any accommodation for outworlders ends. No internet. No TV. No radio. No telephone; well, that’s only partly true—there is a single public telephone booth down the road that takes credit cards where you can call out if there is an absolute emergency. We have even joked (more than half seriously) that the day the Lodge gets internet is the day we stop coming.

But I know how the isolation really works, why the outside world stays far away and cannot intrude. There is a shimmering veil at the bottom of the road, a fantastical barrier that separates the outside world from Lake O’Hara. If you can’t see it, or feel the magical transition that happens as you pass through the veil, (going both ways, by the way), you aren’t really seeing or feeling the wonder of Rocky Mountain backcountry. Once you succumb to the magic, you are in another world. Five or six days without any worries about what’s happening in China or Russia or Ukraine, or Washington D.C or wherever you are from. You re-emerge through the veil rejuvenated, maybe physically exhausted by the thousands of feet of vertical climbs and descents, but knowing that every vacation should make you feel this way. You can’t help but be thrilled and deeply contented with the connection to the natural beauty of Lake O’Hara. 

All behind the veil. Waiting for my next visit.

Thirty Lost Summer Days

Oct. 4, 2022

I still harbor those childhood memories of endless summer days and nights, free from homework and school, playing in the woods behind our home in the country while trying to avoid my dad’s demands to mow three acres of pristine bluegrass lawn and in the evening’s glooming chasing fireflies until Mom called me in for bedtime. The idea that summer should still be a time to enjoy yourself remains a mantra. So, on a July night, the 12th to be exact, I woke up about an hour after going to sleep with an all-over body discomfort, not really pain but a deeply unsettling feeling that something wasn’t right. My anxieties kicked into hyperdrive. Sleep never really arrived that night, nor would I have a decent night’s sleep for another 30 days. I sensed that the rest of my summer plans were out the window.

This tale is not just an unveiling, or an unwelcome revelation of something intimate and personal. It also is about getting older, about the difference between having a weird abdominal pain at 30 and at 69, within days of my 70th birthday.  And it’s about how we should never stop being aware of life’s brutal reality, never forgetting or denying that from one minute to the next, everything can change.

Thirty six hours after the initial pain, I was lying in a hospital bed, a CT scan and ultrasound pinpointing a completely blocked kidney. A day later, successful surgery had removed the blockage, but because of extreme swelling, three or four other stones were left behind. Two weeks later, those were removed in New York. The entire four weeks is a blur, a whirlwind of three anesthesias and procedures. Nothing was remotely normal until a stent was removed on Aug. 12th, 30 days after my pain began. In the end, I got a clean bill of health. Recovery was more about dealing with the dull fog induced by the anesthesias and a total lack of exercise in that long month than about any long-term worries.

Yet nothing was the same, either around me or in my head. My wife’s worries were written all over her face. Hugging my daughter felt somehow more urgent, and more necessary. Dinners with friends presented a challenge to not dwell on my illness, but also to stay focused and not let my mind wander. When I saw a picture of myself taken in the middle of the episode, I looked old and drawn, not a description I would have used before. Instead of proudly trumpeting the idea I was in the best shape of life on July 11th, every step I took felt tentative, every day’s end marked by a deep, unsettling fatigue. Every middle of the night wakeup led to long stretches of dark fantasies about, well, about everything and nothing, some important, some totally trivial. I felt trapped by my anxieties, unable to brush them off or somehow resolve them.

I am keenly aware that every day people wake up with discomfort like mine and the pain turns out to be pancreatic or liver cancer, or some other much more serious disease. My wild thoughts that first night had run through all those dire outcomes, the inevitable anxiety caused by unknown origins of pain. In the wake of the experience, however, the mirror of mortality shook my usually intact sense of invulnerability, that precious terrain that let me live without paralyzing fear of death. After two years of pandemic life and the deaths of close friends, I had to admit that I had constructed rationalizations that I was doing everything to stay safe. Inevitably, the psychological toll of denial of trauma caught up with me, and caused a different kind of paralysis; it was fueled by a loss of optimism, usually a bedrock constant in my life. I was stymied at nearly every turn; writer’s block, procrastination, a lack of focus. Yet still, I externalized the ever-present trauma, boxing it into a place where I could ignore the worst outcomes being suffered by others. My simple kidney stone blockage stripped away those illusions and, despite all my proclamations of being fine and happy, I came face to face with the reality that I had been anxious and struggling to regain my pre-pandemic drive and motivation.

Although only a few short weeks have passed since those 30 lost days, I sense the walls are coming down. On a long hike on a mountainous trail in the Canadian Rockies, a trip that I had worried I wouldn’t even be able to make, I stopped feeling like a patient in recovery. I wouldn’t describe it as a new spring in my step on that 9-mile hike, but I was suddenly less worried about being weak. Upon getting home, I have started writing, diving into tasks that had been ignored for too long, devoting time again to my guitar playing and song-writing, and as an adjunct to my writing, beginning to re-imagine the plot lines of my next novel, 20/20.

Is there a lesson here? There are all the cliches: live life to the fullest every day; don’t waste time on inconsequential things; be aware of your surroundings. So yes, there are lessons, maybe ones that don’t make life’s unpredictability any less scary but that might help us prepare for life’s inevitable curveballs. And it may be too soon to declare victory over the malaise of the past two and a half years. But it’s a start. And I now believe the wake-up call of those 30 summer days will prepare me better for what’s to come.

There will be other summers. Not as many as I had ahead of me at 30. But more than some close friends of mine who aren’t with me anymore; they woke up with a pain one day and didn’t make it through the next year or simply laid their head down and didn’t wake up. I won’t ever forget, as I had forgotten on July 12th, that things can and do change in an instant. I’ve been reminded that one of the best ways to cope is to simply move forward, with that core belief in life’s possibilities. Every day.

God in America

July 17, 2022

I grew up in an evangelical Christian home. My parents were devout Christians who attended church weekly, prayed before every meal, read the Bible regularly and expected their children to do the same. In my adolescence, I professed to be a born again Christian and I enthusiastically joined groups like Young Life and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. Up until college, the church was an integral part of my social life. Without dwelling on the details, I’ll say that my childhood and adolescent beliefs evolved over time into a spiritual landscape that does not, and hasn’t for decades now, included organized religion in any shape or form or denomination.

The only memory I have of politics intruding in our family’s religious life was the 1960 presidential election when I clearly remember my father’s concern over John F. Kennedy’s Catholicism, and whether it was appropriate for a U.S. president to be beholden to the Vatican or the Catholic church. But he was also a devoted Republican at the time, so it wasn’t clear if his vote was informed by religion or political affiliation. Otherwise, my parents lived their Christian values in their personal lives. In the midst of my hometown’s racial violence in 1970, my mother insisted that I invite one of my African-American basketball teammates for dinner at our home, a ranch house in the middle of a 100 percent white, middle class neighborhood. While only one example, I knew my mother, who lived to be nearly 105 years old, treated people with fairness and acceptance regardless of skin color, religious affiliation or background.

Today, my recollections run smack into the debate in the public arena about the role Christianity should have in the public life of the United States of America. Comments like Lauren Boebert’s that the “church should direct government” and that she’s “tired of this separation of church and state junk” reflect a disturbing trend in a segment of the population that shares her beliefs; since she was speaking to a Christian congregation, you can interpret her use of the word church, to mean Christian church. Even the recent Supreme Court decision allowing a high school football coach to pray (we can assume it wasn’t with a Muslim prayer rug) after games at the 50-yard line opens the door to allowing the imposition of one’s personal religious beliefs on non-believers.

One bedrock assumption of the ongoing Christian crusade polemic is that the Founding Fathers, the authors of the Declaration of Independence and subsequently of the Constitution, actually intended the fledgling nation to be guided by the Christian faith.

Those claims about the Founding Fathers are revisionism at its worst. The danger in allowing those claims to go unchallenged is clear. The hidden goal of America’s new Christian crusaders, whether you label it Christian supremacy, or Christian nationalism, is to create a quasi-theocracy in America. It’s not hyperbole to label the movement with those words. Read the movement’s own literature about homosexuals, same sex marriage, birth control, the Ten Commandments in public venues, the primacy of Jesus Christ; the role of women in marriage. Each of these attitudes run contrary to beliefs, both religious and secular, that many Americans hold.

The record is clear. Many of the Founding Fathers were deists. They believed in a divine creator, but not one which actively intervened in earthly activity. Nor did they believe the Bible was the revealed word of God, and they rejected biblical scripture as a source of religious doctrine. In accordance with their beliefs, they rejected the notion of a national religion, or any restrictions on the practice of one’s religious faith, whatever it might be. Here are some salient quotes from the late 18th and early 19th centuries.

Thomas Jefferson: “Christianity neither is nor ever was a part of common law. … In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. (Personal correspondence to Dr. Thomas Cooper, Feb. 1814; Dr. Horatio Spaffard, March, 1817)

John Adams: “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion. (as stated in the Treaty of Tripoli, which Adams signed in 1797)

James Madison: “Religion and government will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed together.” (Letter to Edward Livingston, July 1822.)

For sure there was debate in the Constitutional Convention about the role of religion in the new Republic. But the men there were learned individuals, who knew the history of Europe and the religious conflicts that had battered the continent throughout history. They also had seen laws and attitudes in some American colonies that led to arrest and expulsion and even execution of so-called heretics.

Cognizant of the past violence in Europe and intolerance in the United States, the men writing the Constitution did agree on the wording of the 1st Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

While some argue that amendment doesn’t explicitly call for the separation of Church and State, the intention was clear. Both Jefferson and Adams considered it one of their greatest achievements, keeping the church out of government, but also the government out of churches. Today, the Christian nationalist movement seeks to undermine the original intent of those men, who constructed a framework for a nation that has survived for 246 years.

You may identify as a Christian, either ethnically as I do or as a full practicing member of the faith. You may even believe that the teachings of Jesus Christ are superior to Yaweh, Budda, or Shiva, or Mohammed. But in this country that has not, and hopefully will never, give you the right to impose your faith’s principles on others.

In fact, in all the world’s major religions, there is a simple and wonderful premise: treat others as you would want to be treated. The golden rule: that is universal. If you call yourself a Christian, when you start vilifying others based for their sexuality, their skin color, their politics, you are violating one of the basic tenets of your own faith.