July 1, 2022

I’m back

I have been silent. For too long.

There were more than enough extenuating circumstances to rationalize my retreat from public debates. Covid infections for me and my wife, hers more serious than mine. A slow recovery with long-covid symptoms before our vaccinations, plus repeated clashes with Covid deniers. The deaths of two friends, — both peers and colleagues for more than 40 years, each one about a year apart — were depressing reminders of getting older. Fatigue from futile Facebook debates with Trump-addled brains before and up to and after the 2020 election. All combined into a seething cauldron of self-doubt, depression and latent anger about the state of the world, while trying to find meaning in being a writer. Instead of believing in the possibilities, I questioned whether I had anything to say, or whether it would matter even if I did.

I had a moment of clarity in the midst of my struggles; a friend of mine, upon seeing me for the first time since before the pandemic last October, said, “Hi. Gee, you’re really a Facebook bully.” I have just recently thanked him for the comment because it brought me to my senses, at least temporarily. I pulled the plug on 99 percent of my political commentary on FB, stopped getting upset at the absurdities about the election and Covid posted by people who I once thought were intelligent human beings and tried to devote time to things that made me feel better: Playing my guitar and writing music; Cooking at a higher level of competency and creativity; Devoting more consistent time to my always problematic golf game; Preparing for my daughter’s wedding last year; Getting in the best shape I have been in since we lived in Paris in the late 80s. In some ways, the hiatus has been restorative and beneficial.

But something has been missing. And it’s gone on too long. On top of everything else, having writer’s block or at least a fear of public exposition of my thoughts, has also interfered with my second novel, 20/20. I know it’s time to put the anxieties in the rear view mirror, smash through the writer’s block and get moving forward again. Frankly, the advent of my 70th birthday in a few months is as much a motivation as anything; times a wastin’ as they say.

This is not the relaunch of my Facebook wars. Just a return to putting my thoughts down, and publishing them in my blog, on gordonmottauthor.com — the link will take you directly to the site. Once there, I will also have a FOLLOW button where you can input your email, and get alerts when I publish the next one. If you want to read something other than the headline, or first sentence, you’ll have to visit the site; I also will always post the link. I haven’t set a schedule yet, or topics, but I can assure you I won’t be publishing more than two a month. Of course, full disclosure here, that helps me because that website is also the primary vehicle to tout my fiction: 10/10 is still available. I even can deliver signed copies, if anyone desires; just let me know in the comments section and I’ll be in touch. 20/20 is underway, slowly, with some re-imagining of the narrative to make it more personal and coincidentally more current. I keep being reminded of Thomas Wolfe’s, “You Can’t Go Home Again” as I try to find a narrative vein that speaks to me, and maybe universally, to all of us. But from the seeds of our youth, perhaps come insight into our present. From time to time, I’ll publish finished excerpts.

Here’s to building a more perfect union. Now is not the time to stay silent.

July 2, 2022

Dissecting 2000 Mules: An Editor’s Perspective

I was challenged to watch Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary, 2000 Mules. The film purports to reveal a nationwide conspiracy in which hundreds and hundreds of people were coordinated to deliver illegal ballots to election drop boxes. The documentary focuses on five battleground states — Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona. The premise is this coordinated effort of submitting illegal ballots would have shifted the election from Joe Biden to then president Donald J. Trump. The key investigative tools, per the documentary’s producers, were the purchase of 4 trillion data bytes of geo-location cellphone data in those states in the six weeks preceding the Nov. 5 election, and then publicly availability video surveillance of ballot drop boxes also in those five states.

Who is behind the film?

Dinesh D’Souza is the creator and the narrator; he is a well-known conservative writer and film maker who has promoted various conspiracy theories over the years. He is an author with several controversial books including The End of Racism (“In summary, the American slave was treated like property, which is to say, pretty well.”), and The Roots of Obama’s Rage, a psychological analysis of the former president based on his childhood and his relationship with his father and a 2006 book titled The Enemy at Home, which wove a narrative about how the American liberal left was responsible for 9/11. Since the election of Donald Trump, he has been an ardent defender of the former president.

True the Vote, which describes itself as an election integrity organization, is identified as the executive producer of the film. The founder of True the Vote is Catherine Engelbrecht, a conservative activist with a specific interest in election integrity. She is seen in the film endorsing the validity of the cellphone data. It has been noted in published reports that the data purchase amounted to $2 million (Associated Press reporting) , and was paid for by True the Vote. Greg Phillips is a self-identified election integrity expert, and his firm conducted the bulk of the cellphone data analysis for True the Vote; he is also a board member of True the Vote. I could not find any public information of how much the film cost, but the average cost of documentaries runs from $1000 up to $10,000 per minute of finished product (newbiefilmschool.com), the higher estimate based on a film with production values that could be shown in movie theaters, and not just on YouTube. The cost of the film would be range from $2.1 million to $2.6 million; both numbers include the $2 million for the geodata.

I approached watching this documentary as a civic duty, to be informed about the essence of the Stop the Steal movement, which since Nov. 5 2020, has been in search of an explanation of how Trump lost the election. 2000 Mules does explore new ground in its attempt to find voter fraud. However it’s reporting needs to be judged against standards of investigative journalism. I kept a notepad handy, as if I were listening to a reporter bringing a story to my desk and pushing for immediate publication.

Here are some of those notes, which come from my own study of the 2020 election, and the Trump phenomenon, and questions that arose during my viewing.

— Any notion of balance is absent. Charlie Kirk (Turning Point USA), Sebastian Gorka, Larry Elder and Dennis Prager sit on the far right spectrum of today’s conservative ideologues. They were the panel that, in the documentary’s timeline, were interviewed before they saw the documentary and then again after watching it. D’Souza also is nowhere near the center of the political spectrum; he has been a Trump apologist almost since the beginning, and a fierce opponent of the Democratic Party for decades.

— The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has conducted its own analysis of voter fraud for decades, and has only found 1357 provable cases in review of nearly 40 years of elections. One of the people in the documentary is a current employee of The Heritage Foundation; this previous research is never mentioned, and he is quoted saying fraud could be a problem. But offers no proof.

— Accepts prima facie that geo-tracking data is accurate.

— Asserts ballot harvesters were paid. Who paid them? Who coordinated their efforts? Where are the interviews with some of the 2000 mules? There’s one obscured face of a woman in Arizona, and she’s not a harvester; she was asked to make the deposit of ballots already collected by someone else.

— Liberal non profits involved in the deception. Which ones? Same in each city? (Not one institution is identified)

— Ballot harvesting is an illegal activity. Is it? Cite laws and regulations. (In this case, I’ll answer my own question…it is a false assertion. Only one state totally prohibits any form of “ballot harvesting” or the collection of ballots to be delivered by 3rd parties. 27 states allow it in many specified instances; others restrict it to family members, or caregivers, the latter often defined as nursing home staff.)

— Videos are mostly from fall of 2020, and possibly explains people wearing latex gloves…height of Covid epidemic when many people were doing grocery shopping with latex gloves on. Why not make this more obvious instead of citing it only as a proof of nefarious activity to eliminate fingerprints on the ballots.

— Video of man delivering ballots on bicycle and then stopping to take a picture, cited as evidence of his need to prove his deposit so he could be paid. (Ed. Note: In Philadelphia, the election commission encouraged voters to take pics of their ballot drops and post them on social media to encourage turnout). We don’t know where this bicycle guy was filmed.

— Why doesn’t film explain that in every state, every absentee ballot and every mail in ballot has a signature that is matched to voting records…very deceptively suggests than any ballot received in a ballot box is suspect…simply not true… ballots from drop boxes are generally subjected to a rigorous verification. The signature is subject to examination and verification. Please explain the lack of clarification, and why the discrepancy.

— Simply excise the dubious assertions about someone delivering ballots at 3am…I guess no one on the film has ever worked an overnight shift, or even a night shift. There’s no proof of anything suspicious just because it took place in the wee hours.

Those would have been my first observations and questions to the reporter. But to cross the hurdle for publication, the story needs this:
— Interviews with mules, not one or two, but dozens spread across all five states to show the extent of the conspiracy and the proof it was coordinated.
— Proof of coordination and source of money to pay ballot harvesters..a conspiracy of this size didn’t just happen, and wouldn’t be cheap…their own $10 estimate (they stipulate it could be more or less) means that it would take hundreds of thousands of dollars to have shifted the election. (In Pennsylvania alone, the vote margin was more than 75,000 votes in Biden’s favor, or $750,000 in that state alone.)
—Interview with geo-data analysts to provide credibility to the 2000 mules assertions about that data. Story must have a countervailing point to the main assertion that the data is valid; there are many.
—Interview people whose phones were identified as having met the threshold of 10x visits in a 24 hour period to ballot boxes (same as Mule interviews), but find someone who maybe drove back and forth on one of those days for any other possible reason. Determine other possible causes for the geodata results.
— It is simply inconceivable in the year 2022 that with a conspiracy of this magnitude and the associated outcome affecting a presidential election, someone wouldn’t have had second thoughts and come forward. Look at Jan. 6; people involved have revealed that it wasn’t a spontaneous outpouring of good feelings on a tourist visit to Capitol Hill. Find me someone behind the whole operation, a coordinator, a leader, a mastermind.

Where are the mules?

Those are some of my questions —a few but not all — that I would have been scribbling in the margins with my red editor’s pencil. Someone might argue I was still wrong, but the questions are valid, and demonstrate some of the gaping holes in the 2000 Mules narrative. Here are links to people with more time, and possibly full time jobs to do fact-checks. The bottom line is pretty simple: it does not meet the standards of credible investigative journalism. There are serious gaps in the reporting. I strongly suggest reading these analyses too; they are much more complete than my observations.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/06/evidence-gaps-in-2000-mules/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Mules (this is a compendium of many articles about the documentary)

Finally, after I told the the person who encouraged me to watch 2000 Mules that I had fulfilled his challenge to me, I asked if he was watching the Jan. 6 hearings. His only comeback was to say that the hearings were proving Trump supporters had been duped by government agents and provocateurs into storming the Capitol. That statement, on top of his belief that 2000 Mules proves election fraud against Trump, reveals an unstinting, and uncritical point of view.

After the six hearings from the U.S. Congressional Jan. 6th committee, I can’t imagine anyone believing that the events of Jan. 6th, 2021 were just a spontaneous and peaceful political protest—the evidence and testimony confirms, if nothing else, that the day’s events were premeditated and knowledge of those plans extended into the oval office. Any attempt to rationalize those day’s events any other way simply ignores the facts.

And no documentary can provide the foundation for the attack on the Republic that took place on Jan .6th. In the end, that is what 2000 Mules is about: a justification for using any means to overturn the election. It does not meet the standards of basic journalism rules, and it fails to provide any basis for that justification. That is why it needs to be challenged.

To receive future alerts about my blog posts, please subscribe in the box below.

April 6, 2020

Days Like This

My mother told me long ago that I came out of her womb with a smile on my face. It’s an image that has followed me through my life. Friends, colleagues, new acquaintances often remark, “Why are you always smiling?” It’s just me. I wake up 99 days out of 100 with a smile, looking forward to the day ahead with a sense of joy, of happiness, of anticipation.

My smile wasn’t there today. A foreboding had wormed its way inside my psyche Sunday night. An all-body anxiety that left me on edge, even before mucking around in the fictional terrors of the Roy family in Succession. Bedtime didn’t ease the feeling. I couldn’t find my peaceful place, where with a half a dozen deep breaths, a quick day-dream equivalent of counting sheep and I’m usually fast asleep. I tossed and turned, feeling bloated, swollen, heart racing. I imagined I heard every song of our normal two-hour Spotify Bedtime 1 play list. That wasn’t true because when I drifted back into a semi-conscious mode, the room was silent. But semi-conscious quickly morphed into full panic mode.

Was I hot? Did I have one of my patented, sinus infection induced night sweats? Was I finally being hammered by the onset of the fear we are all living with: Covid-19 was in my house, invading my body. Had that guy who coughed 20 feet away while we were on an early morning walk six days ago infected me? Had I not sterilized my pants after a one block foray to the nearby market to buy an avocado four days ago? Why had we gone out last weekend for a walk without masks? The cascading torrent of paranoid questions wouldn’t let up. Finally, I swung my legs out from under the covers and found a bathrobe, quietly unlatching the bedroom door and slipping outside toward the kitchen where I had left the thermometer, a tool I’d been finding solace in at least once a day.

For 10 minutes I sat at the kitchen island, thermometer stuck under my tongue waiting for the dreaded outcome: A fever and the start of medical emergency for an at risk 67-year-old man. But it was not to be. The thermometer read 97.6. There was no night sweat. There was no headache. I finally took some deep breaths and headed back to the bedroom. (I mercifully had not awakened my wife who slept soundly throughout my panic). I found a comfortable position, curled up a little on my right side, and quickly fell asleep for another four hours.

But my smile wasn’t there this morning. I couldn’t escape the realization that there were going to be more days like this; not really a fair nod to Van Morrison’s song, which is actually more upbeat than my mood. But I can feel the panic subsiding. I can feel the hope rising up through gloom. I can feel the rose-colored hues start to seep into my thoughts.

I’m sure we’re all riding the roller coaster. Optimists like me need to accept that the anxiety is going to crush us sometimes. Embrace it. Live with it. Then let it go. Some days will be better than others. Some days, the world will seem saner. Some days, the flood of ignorance and stupidity will inexorably drag me into a funk.

So, there will be days like this when the smile isn’t there. But the smile will win out. I’m sure of that.

March 24, 2020

Imagine

            Alternate universes. Different realities. How about a quick look at a hypothetical reality of what might have been.

            Imagine a world that when the first cases surfaced in Wuhan, China in late 2019, the Chinese government felt comfortable enough to immediately bring in the World Health Organization, and maybe even a fully-funded Center for Disease Control pandemic team, to investigate what was happening. What if instead of thousands of Wuhan residents traveling by air in the first month after the first case, immediate restrictions were placed on travel and mass testing was begun, using tests that had been developed and stockpiled around the globe during the previous 10 years, since the SARS and H1N1 outbreaks.

            Imagine a global summit on Jan. 15th, 2020 when it was already clear that a coronavirus had crossed the human/animal barrier and appeared to be highly contagious, with catastrophic outcomes in certain vulnerable populations with a pandemic profile for the spread. Imagine a consensus among the leaders of the G-7, G-8, or G-20 simultaneously speaking directly to a world audience explaining the science behind their warning. Imagine them asking everyone to start simple sanitary precautions based on the best information at the time, which by that point, would have been information that had been vetted by independent organizations – like the WHO, the CDC and pandemic teams from other nations.

            Imagine a global mobilization in January to manufacture and stockpile masks, sanitary wipes and bleach to set up repositories around the globe, maybe under the auspices of the United Nations, or a private non-profit likes Medicins San Frontieres, to distribute the supplies as needed to nations facing exponential growth of infections. Imagine a concerted global effort to find ventilators, and to order every manufacturing firm capable of producing them to go on war-footing to build as many as they could in as short a time as possible, with a global fund supported and funded by every world government to pay for the effort. Unused ones would be preserved for future outbreaks.

            Imagine instructions issued worldwide to airlines and transportation companies to institute aggressive cleaning protocols of their equipment. Imagine people getting tested in the millions on a global scale at the first sign of infection.

            Imagine all that.

What we don’t have to imagine anymore in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic is an absolute truth: the world is an interconnected network of people and commerce. It has been that way for the past three decades, at least, if not longer. The people of the world move en mass every day. The goods that they buy come from every corner of the globe, and even if a product says, Made in the U.S.A, or Made in China, or Made in India, or Made in Mexico, the parts and materials used in nearly every item comes from all over the world, often produced through “just in time” inventories. We have all benefitted from that global reality, our goods being more affordable than they would otherwise be. There is no going back. To argue that we can return to a build everything at home policy is to ignore the fundamentals of our democratic, capitalist society.

But imagine a world where we all agreed that our fate is intricately tied to every other people’s and nation’s fate. If we can’t handle a relatively simple threat like a virus, imagine what happens if we learn an asteroid is on a collision path, or that a supervolcano, like the one under Yellowstone Park, is about to blow, or we suddenly are actually visited by a hostile alien culture. The only one of those potential cataclysmic events that hasn’t happened in the history of the world is the last one.

Imagine a world where we didn’t have to guess what to do when one of those threats emerges.

Imagine.

March 18, 2020

Today’s View from Queretaro, Mexico

Covid-19 is in a phase one stage here, with only 93 reported confirmed cases nationwide as of March 18th, according to the government’s health secretary. But necessary and vital precautions are already being taken. Most states have closed schools for the next four weeks. State governments are limiting public events and cancelling many other cultural and arts festivals, at least since last weekend. In my home state of Queretaro, all bars and night clubs have been shuttered. In general, there is palpable sense that the public is aware of the gravity of the situation.

My local Costco outlet is a good example of how people are reacting. Last Friday, when there were only four confirmed cases in Queretaro, a metropolitan area of at least 1.5 million people, the parking lot at noon was full. There were no carts to be found; I waited in one parking lot aisle until someone unloaded their cart which I grabbed and immediately cleaned with my Lysol wipe and entered the store. When I finished getting the things I wanted, including another case of wine, (the essentials, you know), as I approached the front of the store I realized that every one of the 25 to 30 registers had at least 20 to 30 people waiting to check out. It was the beginning of a three-day weekend, but let’s be clear, people weren’t loading up on Clorox and toilet paper and dog food for a three-day weekend. Yet there was no pushing. No loud voices. No complaining. Everyone waited patiently and calmly as the lines inched forward. And in the still full parking lot as I left, there were no horns, no aggressive jostling for spots.

I was told that one possible explanation for the calm and quick preparedness measures dates back to the 2009 swine flu outbreak here. A month after the anomalous flu was first identified, the federal government shut down schools in most affected areas, distributed more than 6 million masks in Mexico City and the Mexico City mayor asked all nightclubs to close for 10 days. In the week after the containment measures were announced, new infections began dropping. Nearly 400 people died in Mexico during the outbreak, but the World Health Organization and the U.S. Center for Disease Control praised the government for its quick action. Today, Mexicans remember the measures taken, and seem to be responding much the same way on their own– with concern and getting ready in case of lockdowns and quarantines.

Maybe my observations aren’t much more than wishful thinking, that somehow Mexico will be spared the worst of this nightmarish virus. Friday is the day that authorities have predicted there could be an exponential leap in new cases. But even in a country with a checkered past of government credibility and disdain for the current administration, the people are responding positively to the crisis. Whatever the final outcome, the situation here is a window on how individuals react to crisis and trauma. That’s one of the themes of my novel 10/10, which was published last year. Check it out on Amazon and Barnes&Noble. There’s going to be a lot more time to read in the next month. #10/10. #gdmott

September 11, 2019

18 Years Ago

I still remember walking out the door of my office building on 387 Park Ave. South, and stopping to greet the doorman on a warm September day. We both turned to comment on a jet plane flying lower than normal to the west, flashing between the buildings as it veered, unbeknownst to us, toward its target. Starbucks coffee in hand, I returned to my desk, only to see an alert that a small plane had hit the World Trade Center. Turning on an office television set, I watched live as the second jetliner slammed in the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

The rest is a blur. Metro-North and subway shut down. Streets in Manhattan jammed with people walking home, or wherever. Getting a rental car with a friend to dash home. Calls to two good friends, one the general manager of Windows on the World in the North Tower, one who worked at the Port Authority in the South Tower. Hours later, learning they were not in the buildings that day. Both personally knowing dozens of people who didn’t survive.

For the next two days, my family and my friend sat stunned, staring in disbelief at the television, alternately crying and then raging at the inhumanity of what we were witnessing. On day three, I returned to Manhattan and visited Ground Zero as a reporter, trying to absorb the enormity of the tragedy.

Years later, I realized I was still traumatized by 9/11. I refused for years to cross the main hall at Grand Central Station for fear of a suicide bomber. I was reluctant to attend big public events. I scanned airport crowds for anyone looking suspicious, and/or nervous. I cried every 9/11 at the sight of the twin towers of projected lights piercing the night sky of lower Manhattan. Paranoia burned deep inside me.

Anyone who was affected that day, in ways big or small, should realize they too were traumatized. And we all need to begin the healing process, whatever it takes. My novel, 10/10, began my process by exploring what happens to people in the midst of tragedy and trauma.

10/10 is now available on Kindle at Amazon, and there are still hardcovers available too there and at Barnes & Noble.

September 1, 2019

Remembering

A Mexican friend visited the 9/11 Memorial in downtown Manhattan last week. She was standing reading the names of the victims on the slanted black granite walls, and looking at the falling sheets of water rushing down the walls into the pool and then into the deep hole in the ground. A man next to her, dressed in a white shirt and white slacks and clutching a backpack to his chest, spoke up, “it’s powerful, isn’t it.” She agreed. He pointed with his finger up to a building to the east, and said, “I was working there on 9/11. I saw terrible things that day.” He went on to explain that he had moved to Boston shortly after the attack to get away from New York. Eighteen years later, in August 2019, he was visiting the memorial for the first time. My friend didn’t ask him any questions, but left wondering what was in the backpack.

We all have our personal backpack filled with 9/11 memories. No one, who was old enough to know what was going on that day in 2001, can forget where they were or what they were doing. Not just vague recollections, but memories with precise details of their surroundings and their feelings.

My 9/11 memories inspired me to write 10/10, trying to explore the complex mix of latent PTSD and fears that trailed after me like an angry wasp, never forgotten and never quite out of my awareness. My experience as a foreign correspondent taught me to manage the worst of my fears, and to keep moving ahead every day, even in the most stressful moments. But it didn’t help me to overcome my reluctance to attend big public events, or to not worry that some deranged shooter or bomber might be waiting on the #6 subway platform or at the clock kiosk in Grand Central station.

Every time I hear a story like my Mexican friend’s, I wonder how many other people have been unable to face their fears, or, maybe even worse, have allowed those fears to corrode their belief in the rest of humanity. Or spiraled into a darkness where all  “others” have become their enemies.

9/11 was a horrific moment in history, but it has also become a cancer in America. We must, like the man in white with the backpack, begin to deal with how 9/11 has affected us. We must come back to face our memories and stare them down. For me, 10/10 has helped begin the healing.

For more on 10/10, visit gordonmottauthor.com. And for those of you waiting for an e-book version, it is now available on Amazon for Kindle devices.

August 20, 2019

More 10/10

It’s been about two months since 10/10 started shipping out to everyone who pre-ordered it. For those of you who read it, and reviewed it, thank you very much. In today’s publishing world, every review, whether its on Amazon or Barnes & Noble or Goodreads, is vital to getting the book noticed and maybe reviewed some more. When you work with a small but prestigious publisher like Val De Grace, it’s even more important to get the word out there. You can expect to keep seeing my posts across the social media world, trying to draw attention to the book, its 9/11 inspired theme..

But I also had a big day this past weekend. I started working on my next novel, 20/20, with outline and character development. So even though my work with 10/10 isn’t done yet, I’m plunging into the next one, part of the promise to myself to not stop with just one book.

Check out gordonmottauthor.com. And look for 10/10 at Amazon and Barnes&Noble, or ask your local bookstore about it. They can order it too so you can support the independent bookstore world.

Thanks. Keep reading.

July 25, 2019

Jon Stewart and 9/11

Jon Stewart gets it. Americans have tried to bury their memories of 9/11. By forgetting, we buried the will to help the hundreds of first responders who risked their lives on that day and then suffered from diseases related to their heroics at the World Trade Center site. Whether it was politics that drove our blindness, or human instinct to protect ourselves from the pain, we simply pushed the memory into the back of our psyches. But in trying to forget, we forgot our own humanity. Many of us simply couldn’t come to terms with the traumas of 9/11. That is a normal, but ultimately unhealthy response.

The world may be coming to its senses. Finally, this week, the Senate and the House passed a bill with near unanimity guaranteeing health coverage for the first-responders until the year 2092. Stewart has led the charge for that bill now for years. He never gave up. He never forgot. He never abandoned the heroes who saved lives that day, and he always honored the hundreds who died just doing their jobs. He never let his own 9/11 traumas stymie his will to forge ahead and help the people who desperately needed it.

10/10, my new novel, examines how easy it is to bury the traumas of the past, and how they undermine our humanity and our ability to lead a normal life. It also explores the extremes people will go to in moments of high stress and anxiety to preserve their own lives, whatever the cost. 10/10 was inspired by 9/11 and its effect on me and the lives of people close to me.

It is time we all started taking a closer look of how 9/11 has warped the world we live in before it’s too late to remember. We should never forget. 10/10 is a path back to our memories, to our traumas.

Find 10/10 on Amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com.

July 8, 2019

More on 10/10

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo hit close to my heart last month when I was in Manhattan for some minor surgery. The day a helicopter crashed into the rooftop of a high-rise building on the West Side, he said, haltingly, “If you are a New Yorker, you have a level from PTSD from 9/11. I remember that morning all too well. He went on to say, “my mind goes where every New Yorker’s mind goes.”

Nearly 18 years after 9/11, Gov. Cuomo struck a cord. We all – New Yorkers, Americans, citizens of the world – have a level of PTSD from that morning. Your anxiety doesn’t have to be a debilitating, can’t-get-out-of-bed kind of PTSD. You can merely live with the latent fear that another catastrophic event is hurtling toward you and there’s nothing you can do about it. The fear that lives inside you is debilitating in ways big and small, and will only be overcome if you expose it and accept the reality that you can’t ignore its effects.

That’s what I set out to do with 10/10, pull back the veil on that horrific morning and the aftershocks it caused in our lives. 10/10 explores what happens when four people’s lives become intertwined in the aftermath of another terrorist attack on New York. Every character still remembers their struggles in the wake of 9/11 and each one feels the ripples of  the “trigger” for their latent fears. Their lives slowly unravel as they try to come to terms with another assault on their sense of security and invulnerability.

Yes, I’d love for everyone to read 10/10 in the context of the story being more than just another page-turner thriller. It’s available now at Amazon and Barnes and Noble.

For more information about the book, and about me, the author, check out gordonmottauthor.com

June 6, 2019

The Lingering Power of 9/11

There is a certain risk in directly calling upon people’s memories of 9/11. It was a traumatic event that affected every American, and virtually every person around the world. To examine the aftermath in the cold light of the passage of 18 years should give us some perspective but, at the same time, the reflection may open deep, old wounds.

If I had any doubts about how much 9/11 and its memories lurked in my own subconscious, they were dispelled in Feb. 2019. I was in New York for an event honoring Marvin Shanken, the man I have worked with for nearly three decades. The ceremony was scheduled for an event space in Battery City, the New York City neighborhood between Ground Zero and the Hudson River.  The easiest way to get there was to take the 1, 2, or 3 subway lines to WTC-Cortlandt street, and exit onto the 9/11 Memorial and Museum Plaza, the site where the Twin Towers once stood. I had not been close to the site since January 2012 when I peered through a slit in the makeshit plywood walls covered in written messages, even though I had reported a story for the magazine shortly after the attack in September, 2011. Not once. Not even close. I had simply avoided opening the wound.

As I crossed the street just outside the subway exit that February, 2019 morning, and stepped into the plaza, I broke down crying. I spent nearly half an hour walking slowly around the granite memorials with their views down into the two reflecting pools at the bottom of the two pits. I touched the walls. I read the names of the victims. I looked skyward several times trying to remember the towers. I ended up being late to the event.

How has 9/11 affected you? Ask yourself that question. I have asked dozens of people in recent months where they were and how it affected them; there is no hesitation, no question in their eyes or voice—they have an immediate answer with sharply remembered details of that morning. But they rarely talk about its effect on them afterward.

In 10/10, by creating a fictional attack on America and thus by extension on all of us, I want readers to begin to explore their own feelings about terror and what it has done to them. Trauma only fades when it is exposed to the light of day, to be examined and talked about and dissected. If 10/10 helps begin that conversation, then I know I will achieved my deepest desire for the book.

May 16, 2019

The Beginning.

How did 10/10 come to be?

The trigger for 10/10 came a few years after that September day in 2001. I was walking along the side passageways of Grand Central Terminal, from my train platform to the #6 subway line on my way to work. As had become my habit, I consciously skirted the main hall at Grand Central, avoiding the kiosk and its iconic clock. I had constructed a story that the next terror attack in New York would take place right there, a suicide jihadist approaching the kiosk and detonating a bomb. It dawned on me if I was still altering my daily pattern because of an event that had occurred years before, how had that momentous trauma touched others and left its mark.

I started and mostly finished a first draft of 10/10 before my wife and I moved to Mexico. I wrote the entire novel on my train commute back and forth to New York every day. Forty-five minutes into the city. Forty-five minutes back. Every day like clockwork. Did my efforts produce nice, clean copy? Hardly. But somehow the routine worked. I completed that draft while being constantly reminded how much I loved writing fiction.

10/10 became more than just a thriller but also an examination of what happens to people who suffer from trauma and how they deal with its fall-out. Yes, my experience as a war correspondent in Central America informed my own struggles with PTSD but they blended in with the smaller, daily traumas most people go through in their lives. The death of a brother from a particularly difficult struggle with cancer. The untimely deaths of friends.  The horrific images of 9/11. I felt that last trauma from a distance after fleeing Manhattan and then watching the horrors unfold on TV with my family. The trauma was real, an assault on my sense of security and safety.

I knew 9/11 affected me for years afterward, and it formed the foundation for something I wanted to say to the world. Like the self-examination I had gone through in the wake of that day, I wanted people to stop and consider the collective trauma the entire country suffered from 9/11. We still are living with the consequences, and it’s time to think about how we regain our equilibrium.

May 10, 2019

A Debut

Many people say they have a novel in them. Inside. Somewhere. Deep and buried. They just can’t find the time or motivation to extract it.

I have had more than one book in me. Two were written and shelved more than 30 years ago.  But my dream remained intact. The dream lived alongside the morbid image in my head that if I reached those last seconds of sentience without having published a novel, I would be really, really pissed at myself.

I made the time. Many people have wondered why I left a successful job as editor of Cigar Aficionado at the relatively young age of 62. There were a number of extenuating circumstances, not the least of which was my wife’s words in my ear saying, ‘What are you waiting for? How long do I have to wait?”  I knew she was right. I had occupied the same chair for 23 years at Cigar Aficionado, and had enjoyed the kind of success any magazine editor or journalist would be thrilled to experience. But I knew something was missing. I also knew as long as I was in that chair, my novel-writing dream would be hard to realize. Along with the desire to spend more time with my wife, and to have time to do many of the things I love doing – golfing, traveling, reading, writing and playing guitar – I believed our move to Mexico would open up a landscape where I could finish my novel.

Our wonderful family therapist, Dr. Steve Fochios Sr. had asked me the most crucial question. He had heard my ramblings for years about my desire to write fiction, and my rationalizations about why it wasn’t happening. He asked me: “Do you have anything to say?” I knew I did, and in my mind, there is a dividing line before and after his question. It broke the logjam, and I began to look for the answer.

10/10 is the answer.